Several options reported by --help=optimize are not documented in the GCC Manual (via invoke.texi) but are still reported with --help=optimize,^undocumented. Here are the options along with the people who checked in the entries to common.opt:
-fipa-cp steven -fipa-matrix-reorg razya -fipa-pure-const zadeck (enabled with -O) -fipa-reference zadeck (enabled with -O) -fipa-type-escape zadeck -fvar-tracking-uninit ctice Is there a policy about whether an experimental option can be left undocumented, or should it be documented with a statement that it is experimental? If an option is left undocumented on purpose then its entry in common.opt should include "Undocumented". Janis
