Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Doug Gregor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > To make this discussion a bit more concrete, the attached patch | > removes this particular warning from -Wparentheses and puts it into a | > new warning, -Wprecedence, that is not enabled by -Wall. This is | > slightly more fine-grained than what -Wparentheses does now. Opinions? | | Personally, I think it should stay in -Wall. But I'm willing to hear | other opinions.
I agree that the warning should stay in -Wall. However, we may consider giving that group a more suggestive name, such as -Wprecedence/-Wno-precedence (enabled by default). -- Gaby
