On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:15 PM, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The patch simply enabled type checking by default. As I don't see how >> we can easily address the underlying problem can you try the following >> which simply makes this typechecking weaker? > > That seems to work. > > FYI test results show 98% pass rate for C++ and 98.6% pass rate for C, > so I'm not sure what the "underlying problem" is, other than > inappropriate assumptions about what backends do. > > To recap: the m32c/80 family of chips does not have an integer type > which is the same size as pointer types, and which has sufficient math > support in the chip to satisfy gcc's assumption of riscness. Thus, > sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(void *) (16 < 24). Yes, it really does have > 24 bit address registers.
Ok, I'll take care of properly comitting the patch. Richard.
