On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 19:07 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > I'm convinced that if check_effective_target_xxx exists then it is > > called and the test directive works as intended. > > Hmmm... how did you prove this? I tried putting verbose in them, > nothing printed. I tried reversing them, no change in test results.
I used send_log in GCC's override of dg-process-target and in the one in DejaGnu when running gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-21.c and other tests that differ for -m32 and -m64. When you used verbose, did you pass --verbose within RUNTESTFLAGS? Janis