Paul Koning wrote:
>> Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> guaranteeing atomicity/preventing corrupted sandbox?
>
> Not just crude, but wrong. You can't get atomicity (or rather,
> transactional integrity) that way, because blocking ^C doesn't block
> SIGKILL, or panics, or power failures, or (in the case of operations
> involving the server) network failures.
Yeah; as I discovered in that final URL, it's purely to try and protect your
local sandbox from getting damaged. And sure, it's only a best effort.
cheers,
DaveK
