On 15/03/2010 22:03, Sean D'Epagnier wrote:
> - { "_Fract", RID_FRACT, D_CONLY | D_EXT },
> - { "_Accum", RID_ACCUM, D_CONLY | D_EXT },
> - { "_Sat", RID_SAT, D_CONLY | D_EXT },
> + { "_Fract", RID_FRACT, D_EXT },
> + { "_Accum", RID_ACCUM, D_EXT },
> + { "_Sat", RID_SAT, D_EXT },
> Now the error is:
>
> test.cpp:5:4: error: expected primary-expression before ‘_Accum’
>
> Does anyone have clues as to the problem?
The problem is that it won't be as simple as that. You'll have to extend
the C++ parser to accept those new RID_ values that it was previously never
expecting to see in those contexts, I would think (but haven't verified
against the source yet). The C++ parser is a hand-coded recursive-descent
parser, so I wouldn't expect it to be generically able to deal with
previously-unknown token types suddenly appearing in its input stream at
arbitrary points.
cheers,
DaveK
