Ok if I do both or the emails are just annoying? I find that bugs are often ignored just as well (but not lost/forgotten, granted. :) ) Thanks, - Jay
---------------------------------------- > To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu > CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: -disable-fixincludes doesn't quite work, minor > From: i...@google.com > Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:50:01 -0700 > > Jay K writes: > >> -disable-libgcc and/or -disable-fixincludes are useful, depending on your >> goal. >> >> Like if you just want to compile C to assembly or object files. >> >> >> It fails, but only after doing what I want anyway. >> >> make[2]: *** No rule to make target >> `../build-sparc-sun-solaris2.10/fixincludes/fixinc.sh', needed by >> `stmp-fixinc'. Stop. >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jkrell/obj/gcc.sparc/gcc' >> gmake[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 > > > Thanks for pointing these things out. However, I hope you are filing > bug reports about these issues you are raising. Problems which are > only reported to the mailing list will be reliably lost and forgotten. > If you want them to be fixed, please open bug reports. Thanks. > > Ian
