On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>>>>> Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    • The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library
>>>>>>      builds.
>>>>>>    • The DejaGNU testsuite has been run, and a substantial majority of 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>      tests pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> See for instance:
>>>>>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg00295.html
>>>>
>>>> There are no libstdc++ results in that.
>>>>
>>>> Richard.
>>>
>>> This is true.  I always run make check-gcc.  What should I be doing instead?
>>
>> make -k check
>>
> 
> Ugh.  And I thought I was golden :)
> 
> This apparently requires autogen to do something about
> fixincludes/check.tpl.  I have no idea what that is or what that
> means....

Just ignore the fixincludes test results.

Andrew.

Reply via email to