On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Joe Buck wrote:
> No, the page now claims something that is incorrect. The C++0x draft
> is no longer evolving. C++11 is an official standard now.
How about the patch below? It tries to reflect the release of
C++11. There definitely will be more adjustments, but this is
a first step addressing the issue Joe raised (and a bit more).
Okay? (I'll also be happy to make further changes.)
Gerald
Index: cxx0x.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cxx0x.html,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 cxx0x.html
--- cxx0x.html 26 Oct 2011 19:48:57 -0000 1.50
+++ cxx0x.html 30 Oct 2011 13:11:47 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<html>
<head>
- <title>C++0x Support in GCC</title>
+ <title>C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC</title>
<style type="text/css">
/* <![CDATA[*/
tr.separator { background: #ffffcc}
@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
</head>
<body>
- <h1>C++0x Support in GCC</h1>
+ <h1>C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC</h1>
- <p>C++0x is the working name of the next ISO C++ standard, due by
- the end of this decade, which introduces a host of new features into
- the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to
+ <p>C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which then
+ was released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features
+ into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to
implement new C++0x features in GCC and to make it one of the first
compilers to bring C++0x to C++ programmers.</p>
@@ -27,10 +27,8 @@
add <code>-std=gnu++0x</code> to your <code>g++</code> command
line.</p>
- <p><b>Important</b>: because the ISO C++0x draft is still evolving,
- GCC's support for C++0x is <b>experimental</b>. No attempt will be
- made to maintain backward compatibility with implementations of
- C++0x features that do not reflect the final C++0x standard.</p>
+ <p><strong>Important</strong>: GCC's support for C++11 is still
+ <strong>experimental</strong>.</p>
<h2>C++0x Language Features</h2>