On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problems arise when user code that uses the "inline-only" code is > linked to other user-code that has a different definition of that > inline-only code. Indeed. A related question is whether for GCC-4.8 we should still continue to claim that C++11 is only experimental? That is at which point are we going to stop claiming that? Is it just a cover for not having to decide anything ABI-wise? If so, I think we can just say that and drop the "experimental" disclaimer. (we don't fully implement C++03, but that does not prompt to claim experimental support.) -- Gaby