On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To be honest, I agree with Gabriel here. And I would go a step > forward, I would say that we are too timid with the warnings we enable > by default or by -Wall. We should warn more agressively, and let users > disable the warnings that they don't care about or are too buggy for > their taste. Because, at the end, it is a matter of taste. We have to be careful here. If a warning switch spews too much noise, especially when building idiomatic codes or the standard library for example, then I don't think it is a matter of taste; it just doesn't have its place in -Wall. And yes, we had had such examples. -- Gaby
