On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 27 March 2014 10:29, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote:
>> Depends on what you need the value for.
>
> Mostly unwind code that uses both FP and SP, example:
But unwind code is inherently platform-dependent. Your objection to the inline
asm that references SP by name is that it’s platform dependent. The builtin
would reduce the amount of platform dependent code by one line, i.e., probably
much less than one percent.
paul
