On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +0000, "Zamyatin, Igor" >> <igor.zamya...@intel.com> wrote: >> > Jeff Law wrote: >> > > The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; however, his >> > > assignment >> > > within Intel has changed and thus he's not going to have time to work on >> > > Cilk+ anymore. >> > > >> > > Igor Zamyatin has been doing a fair amount of Cilk+ maintenance/bugfixing >> > > and it might make sense for him to own it in the long term if he's >> > > interested. >> > >> > That's right. >> >> Thanks! >> >> > Can I add 2 records (cilk plus and libcilkrts) to Various Maintainers >> > section? >> >> I understand Jeff's email as a pre-approval of such a patch. > > I think only SC can appoint maintainers, and while Jeff is in the SC, > my reading of that mail wasn't that it was the SC that has acked that, but > rather a question if Igor is willing to take that role, which then would > need to be acked by SC. >
Where are we on this? Do we have a maintainer for Cilk Plus and its run-time library? -- H.J.
