On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Could you avoid the double negative here? And the error message could > be more specific to the actual error by testing the two cases > separately, e.g.
I'm sort of hoping we don't end up using the hooks in this form for very long - the patch was posted to demonstrate the features that seem to need changes to the hook code, but hopefully that code can get extended upstream to support such features in a cleaner way and then we'll only need some custom configuration, not custom code. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
