gcc
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
Rainer Orth
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
Iain Sandoe
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
ASSI
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
ASSI
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
Rainer Orth
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: gcc-12+: D / phobos runtime
ASSI
Using ranger from cfgexpand
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
Re: Using ranger from cfgexpand
Jeff Law via Gcc
Re: Using ranger from cfgexpand
Richard Biener via Gcc
gcc-13-20230902 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gcc-12-20230901 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
Unexpected behavior of gcc on pointer dereference & increment
Tomas Bortoli via Gcc
Re: Unexpected behavior of gcc on pointer dereference & increment
David Edelsohn via Gcc
Re: Unexpected behavior of gcc on pointer dereference & increment
Paul Koning via Gcc
[PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
[PATCH v8 1/4] spec: add a spec function to join arguments
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
[PATCH v8 3/4] c++modules: report imported CMI files as dependencies
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
[PATCH v8 4/4] c++modules: report module mapper files as a dependency
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
[PATCH v8 2/4] p1689r5: initial support
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support
Jason Merrill via Gcc
Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] P1689R5 support
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
LRA for avr: Clear mem rtx when resizing stack slots?
SenthilKumar.Selvaraj--- via Gcc
gcc-11-20230831 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
Confusing location of error in source code
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Confusing location of error in source code
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: Confusing location of error in source code
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
CLZ when CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is false
Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
Re: CLZ when CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is false
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: CLZ when CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is false
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Re: CLZ when CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO is false
Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
Richard Sandiford via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Re: Question about dynamic choosing vectorization factor for RVV
Richard Biener via Gcc
Analyzer failure due to missing header
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Analyzer failure due to missing header
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Re: Analyzer failure due to missing header
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Analyzer failure due to missing header
David Malcolm via Gcc
Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Robin Dapp via Gcc
Re: Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Re: Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Robin Dapp via Gcc
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Robin Dapp via Gcc
Re: Question about wrapv-vect-reduc-dot-s8b.c
Robin Dapp via Gcc
vect_recog_mixed_size_cond_pattern dead code now
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
Re: vect_recog_mixed_size_cond_pattern dead code now
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: vect_recog_mixed_size_cond_pattern dead code now
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Ben Boeckel via Gcc
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Iain Sandoe via Gcc
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Iain Sandoe
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Iain Sandoe
Re: isl 0.26 C++17 issues when bootstrapping with GCC
Iain Sandoe
[no subject]
โชคอนัน เงินพูน via Gcc
gcc-14-20230827 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gcc-13-20230826 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (3)
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (3)
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (3)
David Malcolm via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (3)
David Malcolm via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (3)
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
gcc-12-20230825 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
How can I run xg++ from its build location?
Michael Welsh Duggan via Gcc
Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?
David Edelsohn via Gcc
Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?
Michael Welsh Duggan via Gcc
Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?
Sam James via Gcc
Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?
David Malcolm via Gcc
Re: How can I run xg++ from its build location?
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
x64 MSABI gcc 3.2.3
Paul Edwards via Gcc
gcc-11-20230824 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
[RISC-V] [SIG-toolchain] Meeting will be canceled (Aug 24, 2023)
jiawei
Request for Software Usage License
孟祥龙
Re: Request for Software Usage License
Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
[no subject]
Joseph Millerschon via Gcc
Re: School District Contact - 2023
Julie Levey via Gcc
Re: School District Contact - 2023
Donna Smith via Gcc
Re: School District Contact - 2023
Susan Miller via Gcc
Announce: GNU MPFR 4.2.1 is released
Vincent Lefevre
gcc-14-20230820 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gcc-13-20230819 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gnu as
h3140067568--- via Gcc
Re: gnu as
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: gnu as
h3140067568--- via Gcc
Re: gnu as
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
gcc-12-20230818 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
GNU MPFR 4.2.1 Release Candidate
Vincent Lefevre
Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
FX Coudert via Gcc
Re: Testsuite issue and warning about floating-point conversion
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
gcc-11-20230817 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
[no subject]
juan solis via Gcc
Porting to a custom ISA
MegaIng via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Paul Koning via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
MegaIng via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Georg-Johann Lay
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Paul Koning via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
MegaIng via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Paul Koning via Gcc
Re: Porting to a custom ISA
Jeff Law via Gcc
Оставьте, пожалуйста, отзыв
COINSTART via Gcc
Using __builtin_unwind_init in glibc
Florian Weimer via Gcc
gcc-14-20230813 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
Get free cash back
Ansel Dogos via Gcc
[no subject]
Ansel Dogos via Gcc
gcc-13-20230812 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gcc-12-20230811 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Martin Uecker
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
Re: Should GCC warn about sizeof(flexible_struct)?
Qing Zhao via Gcc
gcc-11-20230810 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
Weak attribute function limitation
Ashraf, Islam via Gcc
Re: Weak attribute function limitation
Jason Merrill via Gcc
LRA for avr: Arithmetic on stack pointer
SenthilKumar.Selvaraj--- via Gcc
Re: LRA for avr: Arithmetic on stack pointer
Georg-Johann Lay
Re: LRA for avr: Arithmetic on stack pointer
Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
[pushed][LRA]: Implement output stack pointer reloads
Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
[pushed][LRA]: Implement output stack pointer reloads
Vladimir Makarov via Gcc
Please see the following post. Some of you may know the answer.
Luís Carlos Carneiro Gonçalves via Gcc
Re: Please see the following post. Some of you may know the answer.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: Please see the following post. Some of you may know the answer.
Luís Carlos Carneiro Gonçalves via Gcc
Re: Please see the following post. Some of you may know the answer.
Paul Smith
Re: Please see the following post. Some of you may know the answer.
Luís Carlos Carneiro Gonçalves via Gcc
FW: Introducing the "wincall" Calling Convention for GCC
sotrdg sotrdg via Gcc
What should be the type of 9223372036854775808L ? unsigned long or signed __int128?
Helmut Zeisel via Gcc
Re: What should be the type of 9223372036854775808L ? unsigned long or signed __int128?
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
There Might a Bug in the Compiler: When Calling Weak Defined Function
Şahin Duran via Gcc
Re: There Might a Bug in the Compiler: When Calling Weak Defined Function
Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
Re: There Might a Bug in the Compiler: When Calling Weak Defined Function
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (2)
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (2)
David Malcolm via Gcc
Re: analyzer: Weekly update on extending C++ support (2)
David Malcolm via Gcc
analyzer: How to recognize builtins
Benjamin Priour via Gcc
Re: analyzer: How to recognize builtins
David Malcolm via Gcc
RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release meeting reminder (August 07th, 2023)
Eop Chen via Gcc
gcc-14-20230806 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
/home/toon/compilers/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at config/i386/i386.cc:19460
Toon Moene
Re: /home/toon/compilers/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at config/i386/i386.cc:19460
Hongtao Liu via Gcc
Re: /home/toon/compilers/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at config/i386/i386.cc:19460
Hongtao Liu via Gcc
Re: /home/toon/compilers/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at config/i386/i386.cc:19460
Hongtao Liu via Gcc
Re: /home/toon/compilers/gcc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i1.c:1781:1: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'i' or 'n', have 'w' (rtx const_int) in vpternlog_redundant_operand_mask, at config/i386/i386.cc:19460
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
Stack alignment on modern 32 bit bare metal ARMs?
Barrie Slaymaker via Gcc
gcc-13-20230805 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
gcc-12-20230804 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
David Faust appointed BPF backend reviewer
David Edelsohn via Gcc
The gcc version used for compiling qt4.
amber.coles--- via Gcc
gcc-11-20230803 is now available
GCC Administrator via Gcc
GCC support for extensions from later standards
Nikolas Klauser
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jason Merrill via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Nikolas Klauser
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Nikolas Klauser
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Re: GCC support for extensions from later standards
Nikolas Klauser
Successful GCC source build to installation on GNU/Linux
Nevil
testdraft
Nevil
Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Bradley Lucier via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Paul Koning via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Bradley Lucier via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
David Malcolm via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Bradley Lucier via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
Bradley Lucier via Gcc
Re: Where to place warning about non-optimized tail and sibling calls
David Malcolm via Gcc
Add clang's invalid-noreturn warning flag
Julian Waters via Gcc
Re: Add clang's invalid-noreturn warning flag
Andrew Pinski via Gcc
[Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Changbin Du via Gcc
Re: [Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Richard Biener via Gcc
Re: [Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Jan Hubicka via Gcc
Re: [Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Changbin Du via Gcc
Re: [Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Changbin Du via Gcc
Re: [Predicated Ins vs Branches] O3 and PGO result in 2x performance drop relative to O2
Changbin Du via Gcc
Earlier messages
Later messages