John Tytgat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alex Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are some binaries that get installed to > > /home/riscos/cross/arm-unknown-riscos/bin, which don't have the > > arm-unknown-riscos- prefix. I was expecting to be able to add this > > directory to my path if I wanted the binararies without the prefix, > > however the header file search paths are wrong and so it cannot find > > the unixlib headers. Should these binaries work like this? > > Mmh, interesting. I never tried that and haven't thought about it. The > UnixLib and SCL headers are found by specifying a subdirectory inside the > include directory (in order to keep those apart) and that's driven by the > internal option crossdirafter (something Nick invented many years ago) > which that somewhat misuses the CROSS_INCLUDE_DIR a bit (see the cppdefault > and gcc/c-opts patches). > > It could well be that the above mentioned usecase is not covered. You have > any desire to use those unprefixed binaries ?
I was anticipating some scripts/makefiles not adding the prefix, but I might be being unduly pessimistic. If so, is there any other reason for those binaries to exist? Alex -- Alex Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHP, Roots, Subversion, WebJames and more from http://www.alexwaugh.com/ _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
