2008/4/27 John Tytgat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>           Stefan Bellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peter Naulls wrote:
> >
> > > I think now might also be a good time for another version of GCC 4.
> >
> > Regarding that topic ... what about including Ada language support in
> > the GCC 4 builds? I know that you are concerned about the quality of
> > the GNAT and who could take over maintaining it. But what about just
> > including it and clearly flagging it as experimental (assuming it
> > builds without major problems).
> >
> > I think there are quite a few people interested in Ada (myself
> > included). And if time permits I could even imagine looking at the one
> > or other problem, but I cannot guarantee or give a promise.
>
> Nick reported that Ada compiler generated broken ARM assembler code at
> the time he did the initial GCC 4.1 port work. I never tried building
> Ada (nor Fortran) myself.  I'll give it a shot and see if that's still
> the case.
>

I think this was supposed to be fixed in version 4.2, or perhaps 4.3.  I
seem to recall a bit of work being done to clean up target
incompatibilities.

You can build a stage1 Ada compiler, but the stage2 code it generates is
broken.

This was the bug I reported at the time:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20797

Regards,


Nick.
_______________________________________________
GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info
Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK

Reply via email to