In article <ac2ae8c553...@hobbes.bass-software.com>, John Tytgat <john.tyt...@aaug.net> wrote: > In message <dub120-ds25cce559aa95ffe130fa9f0...@phx.gbl> > "Alan Buckley" <alan_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems there are a few potential problems so it may be > > better to stick with GCC 4.1.2 after all. > I disagree as... > > Is there any compelling reason I should update to GCC 4.7? > ...only by using the compiler on real code, we're able to find problems > and fix them. We really can use that kind of testing now by other people > and have problems reported. Otherwise the codebase risks to remain as is. > But of course you have the choice to use whatever version you want. > > If so, is there a way I can set the "-mno-unaligned-access" flag > > in the autobuilder so I don't have to change every package? > I would prefer to hear some details on this issue before resorting to > workarounds. Chris ? I'll try and find a simple program that exhibits the problem. Chris. _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
