You're absolutely right. 

Can you offer an insight as to why the difference in implementation is
accepted by the earlier versions, compared with only the later versions
of gcc with the mechanism I suggested?

Thanks very much for your help in this,
s

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:00 AM
To: MOSS Sebastian
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [GCC-XML] compilation pb running gccxml on code using
SFINAE

MOSS Sebastian wrote:
> Apologies - I forgot the attachment.

I just replaced the has_nested_value_type implementation in
is_templated.hpp with the version I sent before and the whole thing
works just fine in gcc 3.3 and even 2.95.

-Brad 
 
*******************************
This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only.  It may 
contain proprietary material or confidential information.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you are not authorised to distribute, copy or use this 
e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot guarantee that it is virus free 
and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from its use.  If 
you have received this e-mail in error please notify immediately the sender and 
delete the original email received, any attachments and all copies from your 
system.
_______________________________________________
gccxml mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml

Reply via email to