See http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/gccxml/2007-October/thread.html
There have been two recent threads on this topic. On 10/15/07, Bill McCartney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As part of my research, I have been adding function bodies to gcc-xml. I > have been completing the work done by Daniel Lauk which was posted > previously. I have added all the looping, gotos, labels, strings, and > switch statements which were missing in the previous patches. I haven't > tested them much, but I'll post what I have in a few days if anyone asks for > it. I am actually trying to parse C code, and the caveats are starting to > get frustrating. So I will probably begin working on adding pure C support > (if I need to) in the next week or so. > > If there is anyone else working on either of these portions I was hoping > to collaborate. If anyone wants to play with (better) function bodies > please let me know. > > One thing I have been trying to figure out... is there anyway to figure > out where a certain header file was actually included, or is all the > information lost to the preprocessor? > > - Bill McCartney > > _______________________________________________ > gccxml mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml > >
_______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
