On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Brad King <[email protected]> wrote: > Roman Yakovenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Brad King <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Oops, you're right, sorry. Anyway, the output doesn't actually change. >>> It just suppresses the error that the OP saw. >> >> There are some changes in the output. May be not in the format, but in >> the content. For example classes have different members set. >> >> P.S. I run my tests against new gccxml and few of them failed. I will >> investigate the failures tomorrow (pretty sure they are my fault). > > Can you please send me a small example of what has changed? I want to > make sure I didn't break the original fix with this.
No, I don't have a small example :-(. Let me investigate this and I will come back to you tomorrow. -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ _______________________________________________ gccxml mailing list [email protected] http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
