Hello, the new guidelines for Fedora packages require specific descriptions of the software licenses. While GPL was enough in the past, now the specific version is required, as is the possibility of relicensing under later versions (the “or later” phrase). So far, I have adjusted the license tag to GPLv2+. Is that correct? I.e., can every file in the source be relicensed under a later GPL version? Thanks for the info in advance.
Regards, Julian P.S. I am looking into the rpmlint warnings issue right now. So far it seems to be a false positive, since running the validation tool against gchempaint returns (among others): W: gchempaint unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgcpcanvas-0.8.2.so /usr/lib64/libgcu.so.0 And it seems unlikely to me that gchempaint is not using libgcu. _______________________________________________ Gchemutils-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main
