Dear Jean,

the issue is still there, gnumeric has changed its soname between 1.12.0
and 1.12.1:

$ rpmsodiff gnumeric-1.12.0-3.fc19.x86_64.rpm
gnumeric-1.12.1-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
        sonames only in gnumeric-1.12.0-3.fc19 [1]:
libspreadsheet-1.12.0.so        /usr/lib64/libspreadsheet-1.12.0.so

        sonames only in gnumeric-1.12.1-1.fc19 [2]:
libspreadsheet-1.12.1.so        /usr/lib64/libspreadsheet-1.12.1.so

        no common sonames

Regards,
Julian

W dniu 10.03.2013 22:12, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> I need to check this. During the 1.11.x gnumeric cycle the soname was
> being bumped every release hence the need for rebuilds.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julian
> 
> W dniu 10.03.2013 18:52, Jean Bréfort pisze:
>> I just forgot, but now you don't need to repackage gchemutils after each
>> goffice or gnumeric update. The plugins are installed in
>> $LIBDIR/goffice/0.10 and $LIBDIR/gnumeric/1.12.
>>
>> Jean
>>
>> Le dimanche 10 mars 2013 à 15:48 +0100, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
>>> Hi Jean,
>>>
>>> thank you for the pointer. I am now updating the whole stack in one go.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> W dniu 10.03.2013 11:43, Jean Bréfort pisze:
>>>> Hi Julian,
>>>>
>>>> I uploaded 0.14.1 yesterday, but not announced it yet. I'll do in the
>>>> evening if time permits.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jean
>>>>
>>>> Le dimanche 10 mars 2013 à 10:11 +0100, Julian Sikorski a écrit :
>>>>> Dear Jean,
>>>>>
>>>>> is there a new point release of gchemutils planned? New goffice/gnumeric 
>>>>> have just been released. Given that I need to rebuild gchemutils for 
>>>>> those anyway, if a new release is planned I could just wait a couple of 
>>>>> days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Julian
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gchemutils-main mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


_______________________________________________
Gchemutils-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main

Reply via email to