Le samedi 07 mai 2016 à 18:33 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit : > W dniu 07.05.2016 o 16:58, Jean Brefort pisze: > > > > Le samedi 07 mai 2016 à 15:51 +0200, Julian Sikorski a écrit : > > > > > > W dniu 01.05.2016 o 15:47, Jean Bréfort pisze: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Looks like GChemPaint has serious display issues when run over > > > > gtk+- > > > > 3.20 (gray background in the main window and, more critical, > > > > invisible > > > > buttons in the toolbox). > > > > > > > > As things work with the unstable branch (svn trunk, not > > > > 0.15.1), > > > > the > > > > easy way to fix it is to backport some code from it to the > > > > stable > > > > branch. This means API instability, but it should not be an > > > > issue > > > > since > > > > the libraries are not used elsewhere. And while there I think I > > > > might > > > > backport new features which seem already stable such as support > > > > for > > > > math equation display using lasem. Would adding this new > > > > dependency > > > > an > > > > issue for some packagers? I know there is a lasem rpm in > > > > fedora, > > > > but > > > > nothing in debian (although there is an old request for it). > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jean > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gchemutils-main mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main > > > > > > > Hi Jean, > > > > > > I looked for references of Lasem for fedora but I could not find > > > any. > > > RPMFind only returns OpenSUSE packages. Please may you clarify > > > where > > > did > > > you see references to Fedora lasem rpm? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Julian > > Hi Julian, > > > > I found this one: > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/23801403/dir/fedora_19/ > > com/ > > lasem-devel-0.4.1-7.1.i686.rpm.html > > > > Looks like it is related to OpenSuse though. > > > > Best regards, > > Jean > > > Hi Jean, > > this does not look like proper Fedora package unfortunately. > Moreover, > Fedora 19 is 3 releases older than the oldest supported branch. > As such, I am not in favour of adding this dependency. While I could > submit it for review, I cannot tell how long would it take to get the > package into Fedora repositories. > > Best regards, > Julian
OK, I'll make it optional then. Best regards, Jean _______________________________________________ Gchemutils-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gchemutils-main
