Greetings! I have no comprehensive results at the moment but am always interested in fixing known slowness in GCL generated code, in case you have a favorite benchmark or two. I would love to update the suite in the source tree with more modern realistic tests that could be used as a quick parity check before release.
I'm aware of at least one interesting item in this regard -- 2.7.0 automatically transmutes the takr benchmark into a mutually recursive equivalent state machine. Take care, "Adrienne Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The release notes for GCL 2.6.2 indicated that GCL was about as fast as CMUCL. > I'm curious to know if we have surpassed that benchmark with the 2.7.x > unstable > series. Is there any new data comparing GCL's speed with say that of SBCL? > > Adrienne > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gcl-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel > > > -- Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah _______________________________________________ Gcl-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
