On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Jonathan M. Lane wrote: > I think it might be time to revise unAPI to encourage (preferably mandate, > but that's probably unrealistic) the use of the value class pattern, which is > a proven microformat pattern that does not have the same accessibility issues > as the ABBR design pattern.
Thanks for bringing this up. Sorry for the delayed response. I haven't been tuned in to microformats in a while. Is this the pattern you're referring to? http://microformats.org/wiki/value-class-pattern I'm not sure there's a lot to gain from updating unAPI at this point. Are you using it? -Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gcs-pcs-list" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gcs-pcs-list?hl=en.
