gdal-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [gdal-dev] Does GDAL provide ring-level structural validation without GEOS topology validation? Denis Rykov via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Does GDAL provide ring-level structural validation without GEOS topology validation? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL Debian packaging and Parquet Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Debian packaging and Parquet Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta1 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta1 available Roger Bivand via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta1 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta1 available Roger Bivand via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta1 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] CSHARP: Proposal to Remove Mono from the CMAKE build scripts Paul Harwood via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] CSHARP: Proposal to Remove Mono from the CMAKE build scripts Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] CSHARP: Proposal to Remove Mono from the CMAKE build scripts Paul Harwood via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] CSHARP: Proposal to Remove Mono from the CMAKE build scripts Paul Harwood via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] ExportToGML with compound CRS Joep Keijsers via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ExportToGML with compound CRS Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ExportToGML with compound CRS Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ExportToGML with compound CRS Joep Keijsers via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Registrations open for the next OGC Code Sprint 📣 Joana Simoes via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Michael Sumner via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Code name for 3.13.0 ? Ian Turton via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] AI/LLM tool policy: failure Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AI/LLM tool policy: failure Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Parquet error/warning on large list columns Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Parquet error/warning on large list columns Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] PROJ 9.8.1 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Carl Godkin via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Carl Godkin via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Carl Godkin via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble building GDAL 3.12.3 on Linux Carl Godkin via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] gdal raster calc and -i nested pipeline, proper usage? Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] gdal raster calc and -i nested pipeline, proper usage? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] gdal raster calc and -i nested pipeline, proper usage? Scott via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] ETRS89 issues with PROJ 9.8.0 Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] inconsistent naming for the CLI "input" argument Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] inconsistent naming for the CLI "input" argument Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] inconsistent naming for the CLI "input" argument Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] inconsistent naming for the CLI "input" argument Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] inconsistent naming for the CLI "input" argument Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Edouard Choinière via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Integrating AI assisted code review for PR in OSGeo/GDAL? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] ogrinfo vs gdal vector info equivalent command Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ogrinfo vs gdal vector info equivalent command Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ogrinfo vs gdal vector info equivalent command Scott via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Florian Katerndahl via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Florian Katerndahl via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Florian Katerndahl via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Coordinate transformation of geometries between CRSs with different axis ordering (C API) Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] using NaN as no-data value Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] using NaN as no-data value Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] using NaN as no-data value Daniel Evans via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] using NaN as no-data value Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Daniel Evans via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Kirk Waters - NOAA Federal via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Michael Sumner via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? ky via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Anyone has already forgotten the /vsicurl/ prefix? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Wrapper string encodings are inconsistent Michael via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Wrapper string encodings are inconsistent Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Wrapper string encodings are inconsistent Michael via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Wrapper string encodings are inconsistent Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL_COMPILATION and standalone plugins Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL_COMPILATION and standalone plugins Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] ubuntu-full-latest-amd64 docker image not updated? Vincent Schut via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] ubuntu-full-latest-amd64 docker image not updated? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Building GDAL, file format not recognized Mazin Marwan via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Building GDAL, file format not recognized Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Building GDAL, file format not recognized Surendrakumar Dandru via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] a_scale per band Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] a_scale per band Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.3 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] WFS-T Transaction serializes Date/DateTime fields in non-ISO format Denis Rykov via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] WFS-T Transaction serializes Date/DateTime fields in non-ISO format Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] WFS-T Transaction serializes Date/DateTime fields in non-ISO format Denis Rykov via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] shapelib 1.6.3 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 as final release Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.3 release candidate Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.3 rc2 is available (was Re: GDAL 3.12.3 release candidate) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] optimizing GTI performance (follow-up on #14063) Vincent Schut via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] optimizing GTI performance (follow-up on #14063) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] gdal2tiles: use gdal raster tile underneath Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL Process Exit Codes and stderr Peter Townsend via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Process Exit Codes and stderr Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL Process Exit Codes and stderr Peter Townsend via gdal-dev
  • [gdal-dev] GDAL & AI Scott via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] CPL_LSBSINT64PTR and CPL_LSBUINT64PTR ? Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] CPL_LSBSINT64PTR and CPL_LSBUINT64PTR ? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] CPL_LSBSINT64PTR and CPL_LSBUINT64PTR ? Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] OGRCoordinateTransformation::Transform() memory usage clarification David Klaus via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] OGRCoordinateTransformation::Transform() memory usage clarification Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] OGRCoordinateTransformation::Transform() memory usage clarification David Klaus via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] OGRCoordinateTransformation::Transform() memory usage clarification David Klaus via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GSoC Proposal Idea: Strengthening GDAL Python Stub Generation via Runtime Consistency Validation Sionigdha Sadhukhan via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GSoC Proposal Idea: Strengthening GDAL Python Stub Generation via Runtime Consistency Validation Sionigdha Sadhukhan via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GSoC Proposal Idea: Strengthening GDAL Python Stub Generation via Runtime Consistency Validation Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] How to control memory usage in gdal and understand caching for local raster data Trygve Aspenes via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] gdal vector convert, should --output-layer be required with CSV? Scott via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Error on gdal raster info in VRT - PROJ: No GeoPixelScale tag in overviews Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Error on gdal raster info in VRT - PROJ: No GeoPixelScale tag in overviews Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Error on gdal raster info in VRT - PROJ: No GeoPixelScale tag in overviews Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Error on gdal raster info in VRT - PROJ: No GeoPixelScale tag in overviews Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Error on gdal raster info in VRT - PROJ: No GeoPixelScale tag in overviews Michael Smith via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Daniel Morissette via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Frank Warmerdam via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Unable to use ADBC in GDAL 3.12.2 Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Unable to use ADBC in GDAL 3.12.2 Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Performance benefits of using USE_PARQUET_GEO_TYPES=yes Michael Smith via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Getting summary data from parquet with sql Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Getting summary data from parquet with sql Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Getting summary data from parquet with sql Michael Smith via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GPKG : how to save tile into 1-band 8-bit PNG Philippe Ghesquiere via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GPKG : how to save tile into 1-band 8-bit PNG Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GPKG : how to save tile into 1-band 8-bit PNG Philippe Ghesquiere via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GSoC 2026 – Inquiry on Priority Development Areas in GDAL Sionigdha Sadhukhan via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] gdalgviz - a Python library for visualising GDALG pipelines Seth G via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.2 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Jan Heckman via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Alexandre Gacon via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Frank Warmerdam via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Tamas Szekeres via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.12.2 RC1 as final 3.12.2 Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] QGIS - was Re: GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] QGIS - was Re: GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] QGIS - was Re: GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] QGIS - was Re: GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.2 release candidate Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Breaking API Change Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Breaking API Change Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Breaking API Change Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Breaking API Change Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Breaking API Change Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] gdal.Run not taking arguments Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] gdal.Run not taking arguments Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] FLIR thermal with embedded image Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] FLIR thermal with embedded image Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] FLIR thermal with embedded image Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] FLIR thermal with embedded image Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] SetSpatialFilter geometry filtering vs bbox filtering Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] SetSpatialFilter geometry filtering vs bbox filtering Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] SetSpatialFilter geometry filtering vs bbox filtering Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] port/cpl_json.h and clang -Wsign-conversion Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] port/cpl_json.h and clang -Wsign-conversion Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] test (please ignore) Jeff McKenna via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] reading raster from memory Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] reading raster from memory Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Ari Jolma via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Ari Jolma via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Ari Jolma via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Ari Jolma via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Ari Jolma via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Reading from (geo)parquet using mixed spatia and non-spatiall filters Even Rouault via gdal-dev

• Earlier messages