On 10/01/2010 03:20 PM, Hermann Peifer wrote:
On 01/10/2010 07:03, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Hermann Peifer<peifer<at>  gmx.eu>  writes:


At work, we are taking this "standard grid" issue pretty serious, but
indeed, we might be the only ones worldwide with such a business rule.

You are not alone, we are reprojecting our rasters to standard grid because it helps in making seamless mosaics from the reprojected images. We are widening the target extents a little bit to all directions with a python script to suit
the grid.


So we are already 2 ;-)

Actually, I tentatively thought there would be more. This was why I wrote to the mailing list in the first place. I am aware that this (non-)issue can be solved in a shell one-liner or perhaps X lines of some other script code. I just thought that if there is a general interest, it could perhaps be built into the library.

Make that 3 :-)

We also often do this, when different datasets (from several satellite sensors) need to be used together. Cause I do almost all my gdal stuff in python, I just coded this grid matching into the relevant python scripts. However, if support for it would be built into the gdal command line utilities, we would undoubtly use it often.

Vincent Schut.

Hermann
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to