Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 21:00:42, Eli Adam a écrit : > Ragi, > > I tested the driver on just one FileGDB which included a date > field. You stated, > > Known issues with build / FileGDB driver > - (driver issue) blobs and date fields are not handled at all
Yesterday, with the Michael Smith's test filegdb, I fixed the handling of date fields, so if you just update from SVN, it should work now. An example with blobs would be usefull > > Here is what I did and successfully got the data. The date field was > made a double and populated with 0, however, since it says that date > fields are not handled, it is nice that the rest of the process still > worked on the other fields and the data was exported. > > ogr2ogr ODF_Lincoln_Roads.shp West_Oregon_Roads.gdb > "ODF_Lincoln_Roads" > Warning 6: Field RDSRCDATE create as date field, though DateTime > requested. > > Warning 6: Normalized/laundered field name: 'CONSTRUCTED' to > 'CONSTRUCTE' > Warning 6: Normalized/laundered field name: 'Shape_Length' to > 'Shape_Leng' > Warning 1: Row id: 4 col:10 has unhandled col type (11). Setting to > NULL. > ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to determine value for column CONST_DATE > long:-2147217395 > ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to determine value for column CONST_DATE > long:-2147217395 > > Thanks for the work on this. > > Eli > > >>> On 4/13/2011 at 11:13 AM, in message > > <banlktimitsqyjfixfrys05jkeibya+t...@mail.gmail.com>, Ragi Burhum > > <r...@burhum.com> wrote: > > Perfect. Thank you Michael. > > > > - Ragi > > > >> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:45:25 -0400 > >> From: "Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH" <michael.sm...@usace.army.mil> > >> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test > >> To: Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org>, > >> > >> <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> > >> > >> Message-ID: <c9ca2415.2220d%michael.sm...@usace.army.mil> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > >> > >> I have a test v10 filegdb with points, lines, polygons (all with Z > > and M > > >> but > >> I think the measures aren't populated). There are also some non > > geometry > > >> tables and some relationship classes. > >> > >> Its available at > >> > >> http://12.189.158.78:8081/downloads/test_fgdb.gdb.zip > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Smith > >> Remote Sensing/GIS Center > >> US Army Corps of Engineers > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/12/11 2:48 PM, "Even Rouault" <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> > > wrote: > >> > Le mardi 12 avril 2011 20:40:58, Matt Wilkie a écrit : > >> >>> ArcGIS 10 FileGDB's right ? > >> >> > >> >> If the api allows for using gdb's from different versions then > > the test > > >> >> suite should have different versions too. In any case I can make > > v10 > > >> gdb's. > >> > >> > No, the FileGDB API only reads v10 gdb's. > >> > > >> >>> Current GDAL trunk builds against FileGDB API beta3 under Linux > > 32bit. > > >> >>> Too bad ESRI doesn't provide any 64bit build of the FileGDB API > > (yet... > > >> >>> ?) > >> >> > >> >> """ > >> >> We are working on a Linux 64-bit release of the File Geodatabase > > API. It > > >> >> will not release with the 1.0 release of the API, but as a part > > of a > > >> >> follow on release later this year. > >> >> > >> >> Lance Shipman > >> >> Geodatabase Product Engineer, File Geodatabase > >> >> esri > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev