Perhaps I should clarify a bit what I meant, I haven't had any reactions until now, positive or negative, and it is important for me.

I use Gdalwarp and gdaladdo extensively for goereferencing and tiling large historical maps serieses (raster scans). To display them efficiently, I need to create layers at different scale levels, e.g. if the original maps have a pixel size of 10 meters, I need to resample them to rasters with pixel sizes of 20, 40, 80 , 160, 320 and 640 meters, and tile all those maps appropriately. So the original maps have to be resampled quite drastically. In Gdalwarp there is no adequeate resampling algorithm, and you end up with very grainy map at those lower resolutions. Gdaladdo has several more algorithms, with gauss in many cases the most efficient. However, even with the gauss filter, maps resampled at very low resolutions turn out too hazy. For an example see the 1930 map of the Netherlands:

http://mapserver.sara.nl/topo/triang/

If you zoom in to more detailed levels, you'll see the way the image sharpens. For the effect on black-white image choose the TMK-map (1850) with the top-center button. Filters like "unsharp mask" would perform much better in these cases.

So I would like to propose two enhancements to gdal:

- add additional filters to gdalwarp, gauss and the filters mentioned below.
- implement more filters for gdalwarp and gdaladdo, e.g. "unsharp mask", or the "mode" filter asked by Jack below. Perhaps even add the possibility to specify parameters, like in ImageMagick

I don't know how difficult is, and whether the gdal devs would find this really an improvement for gdal. I could do this with some ImageMagick or Gimp scripts, but it would be a kludge. As we are going to georeference the complete cadastral and topographical map base of the Netherlands from 1832 to 1994 the next few years (millions of map-scans), this exentsion of gdal would come in very handy. And funding it will really be no problem at all.

I would appreciate any kind of comment on this, positive or negative.

Regards,

Jan

Dr. J. Hartmann
Department of Geography
University of Amsterdam

On 03/27/2013 10:13 PM, John Twilley wrote:
I'm interested in this feature request as well. Adding the mode resampling algorithm to gdalwarp would be very beneficial to my projects, right up there with being able to access the warp API from Python. Is this at all possible? Should I submit a feature request on Trac, or what? Just let me know!

Jack.

--
mathuin at gmail dot com


On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Jan Hartmann <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Hi devs,

    Would it be possible to add gauss and other interpolations to
    gdalwarp? At the moment I georeference large scans to 2000*2000
    tiles at the most detailed scale, and then create 2000*2000 tiles
    at resolutions of 2, 4 6 etc  times the original scale, using
    gdaladdo and gauss or other interpolations. It would help
    immensely if I could do that directly with gdalwarp.


    Funding would probably no problem. The question is: can and should
    it be done?

    Jan



    _______________________________________________
    gdal-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev




_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to