Sam, It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating booleans as Byte instead of integer.
Best regards, Frank On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham....@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi All, > > I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster > Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some > new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and > these have been incorporated into the RFC: > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support > > Thanks, > Sam. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
