Selon Martin Lewis <mle...@ngms.eu.com>: > Unfortunately. Even, 'that's life' in my customers world was too slow.
I didn't imply that you had to bear poor performance. For higher performance, other protocols, tile-oriented and cache friendly, are more appropriate such as WMTS, TMS. > > Now I understand what the WMS driver is doing in terms of BlockSize and > DataWindow, I can work round the issue for the time being by requesting a > data window sized block in a single request rather than lots of smaller > blocks in several requests. > > This has effectively speeded up the user interaction from about 5 secs to > 1-2 secs, an acceptable delay when navigating around a map. > > Thanks > > Martin > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-WMS-Issues-Two-Requests-tp5102423p5102848.html > Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev