You might be able to gzip compress the file GDAL can read gzip files transparently, but I am not sure that the csv reading code in GDAL works with compressed files.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Yann Chemin <yche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Even, > > I would be interested to include it. But I see that the 1Mb > uncompressed text is an issue. > > If it was OK for the additional Mb in the source code, > what would be the place to look into gdal code to create the patch needed? > > Thanks, > Yann > > PS: did not copy other lists as I am not a member, registered to proj > ML today though. > > On 15/05/2014, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> wrote: > > Selon Yann Chemin <yche...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> is there planetary datum support in this new version (i.e. Moon 2000, or > >> etc.)? > > > > No, I don't think that the EPSG folks are interested in other planets yet > > ;-) > > But Frank mentionned some time ago ( > > > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/IAU-2000-Coordinate-System-Dictionary-td3750798.html > > ) that he wanted to investigate how to deliver the IAU set of planetary > > coordinate systems , but this hasn't been pursued further AFAIK. > > > > I see there's a version of this file here : > > http://svn.osgeo.org/metacrs/sr.org/srsbrowser/data/IAU2000.wkt > > > > Even > > > >> > >> Yann > >> > >> On 14/05/2014, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I've followed the update process of the EPSG SRS database to latest > >> > v8.4, > >> > and > >> > just committed the updated files into libgeotiff, GDAL and PROJ trunk. > >> > Also > >> > > >> > submitted to PostGIS. > >> > > >> > From what I can see, among many changes and additions, 2 new > projection > >> > methods have been added: > >> > * 1051,Lambert Conic Conformal (2SP Michigan) > >> > --> looks very close to standard "Lambert Conic Conformal (2SP)", with > >> > the > >> > addition of a new parameter K, the ellipsoid scaling factor. > >> > * 1052,Colombia Urban > >> > > >> > I don't think any of those 2 new methods are currently handled by > PROJ, > >> > so > >> > the > >> > new PCS based on those projection methods (3 Michigan SRS, and several > >> > dozains > >> > of Colombia PCS) will not be handled by GDAL nor PROJ. > >> > > >> > Regarding GDAL, I've improved the add_esri_column.py script (see > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/geotiff/changeset/2446), so that we have more > >> > ESRI > >> > DATUM > >> > names. That should make morphing from/to ESRI .prj files a bit better. > >> > > >> > Regarding PROJ.4 'espg' and PostGIS spatial_ref_sys.sql files, I've > >> > also > >> > added > >> > the list of SRS that are GEOCCS (GeoCentric) and COMPD_CS (Compound > >> > Horizontal > >> > + Vertical). > >> > > >> > Please let me know if you see issues. > >> > > >> > libgeotiff: > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/geotiff/ticket/63 > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/geotiff/changeset/2447 > >> > > >> > GDAL: > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5462 > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/27322 > >> > > >> > PROJ: > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/proj/ticket/236 > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/proj/changeset/2448 > >> > > >> > Submitted for PostGIS : > >> > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2737 > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > > >> > Even > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Geospatial professional services > >> > http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > gdal-dev mailing list > >> > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ---- > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > ---- > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
