Hi Scott,
I make the table of cmaking the GDAL.
https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/wiki/cmake-driver-status
May be some drivers that already cmaked I missed and vice versa, but the
whole picture can be seen.
About "is the probability of cmake4gdal replacing autotools" I agreed
with Even. We need the full and working system and several releases.
Also, cmake not to influence on gdal sources, so the two build systems
can live together and one can use the preferable.
Certanly I prefer cmake :)
Also, I forgot to mention, that some checks in autoconf (the C/C++ test
code) should be add to cmake too.
P.S.
Be free to send your pull request with cmaking of GDAL to our repo.
Best regards,
Dmitry
10.02.2015 02:34, Scott Bailey пишет:
Dmitry,
Great! So which drivers need CMake help?
And what is the probability of cmake4gdal replacing autotools?
SB
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Dmitriy Baryshnikov
<bishop....@gmail.com <mailto:bishop....@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Scott,
The latest code is here:
1) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/cmake4gdal
2) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/rsmd-reader-dev <--
this my current branch
3) https://github.com/nextgis/gdal_svn/tree/wms-ags-dev
There are some problems:
there is no autotest directory in current repo, but it'll be more
correctly to have the whole fork, not only sources (CTest?).
So I plan to merge this three branches and make the full fork
(with autotest) of OSGeo/GDAL in github.
Anyhow we need to complete all drivers which is not yet cmaked.
I plan to create wiki page in new repo with table of all GDAL
drivers and their cmaking status and total percent.
By now we need:
1) More testing and fixing on all platforms
2) Cmaked all drivers and applications, which is not yet cmaked
3) I plan to play with third party libs by cmake mechanism -
ExternalProject_Add
As for me the 2) is more important.
Best regards,
Dmitry
09.02.2015 22:02, Scott Bailey пишет:
Building GDAL for Linux is a snap, MSVS is OK, but I find myself
struggling to get a compilation with MINGW.
I've cloned the cmake4gdal 1.9 git repo and built that in Linux.
As expected it was simple. Haven't had time to play with MINGW,
yet. Never-the-less, I've found CMake based projects less
frustrating than autotools when building with Windows, especially
when using MINGW.
What is the status of cmake4gdal? Is there something I should do
to help?
--
Scott Bailey
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
Scott Bailey
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
