On jeudi 30 mars 2017 16:51:49 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 30 March 2017 at 16:48, Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote: > > On jeudi 30 mars 2017 07:34:35 CEST Kurt Schwehr wrote: > >> At one point, I had a autoconf configure setup that was pretty minimal. > >> > >> While it built, it was not so much fun to work with. Here are some > >> > >> remnants of notes that might constitute the beginnings of a > >> > >> sourceme-minimal.sh. More will likely be needed depending on libs are > >> > >> already installed on your machine. And gdal without many of these libs > >> > >> (e.g. proj4, geos, libz/zlib) is just frustrating. > > > > As it seems several people have needs for minimized builds, perhaps they > > should consider upstreaming their efforts with build options (like > > --minimal and then --with-XXXX to selectively enable drivers), and the > > potential code refactoring that might make it easy. I think a continuous > > integration target that would test that would be needed to ensure this > > doesn't get broken by later developments. > > BTW, I'm not sure what is wrong with the manual minimal build > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/BuildingOnUnixWithMinimizedDrivers
Nothing. I also tested it successfully after you update I think somepeople want even more minimized builds, presumably for embedded systems, without most drivers that don't depend on external libraries. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev