Hi, Without test data it is very hard to say much. I believe that the promise of tps is that the ground control points stay where they are set. The intermediate points follow the least tension surfaces and I do not know how exactly those spline algorithms are defined. Raster data is full of points to warp but probably in the vector data the transformation is done vertex by vertex. I would first check if the GCPs are in the same place in both outputs. Then I would make a test by densifying the vector data before georeferencing to have much more vertices and see if it has any effect on the result.
-Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev <gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> Puolesta Stijn Tallir Lähetetty: keskiviikko 16. elokuuta 2023 10.29 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] tps - gdalwarp vs ogr2ogr Hi, According to the documentation gdal and ogr use the same algorithm for the tps-transformation but I don't seem to get the same results using the same set of gcp's for images and vectors. I have images that are unreferenced and vector data digitised on these images (in pixel coordinates). The images are then georeferenced with +100 gcp's and warped with gdalwarp using the "tps" option. When I use the same gcp's (with adjusted y-origin to lower left corner) to georeference the vector data with ogr2ogr and the "tps" option I get different results. The vector-result is similar to the image-result but never exactly the same and differences can be substantial. Any thoughts? Stijn
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
