On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:34:08 +0800 Chow Loong Jin <hyper...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 19:07 +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote: > > Sounds quite good so far and wouldn't require much more than a 'svn > > mkdir other' :). > > > > But still the problem what I'm afraid of is that we end up in a mix of > > various plugins, plugin releases and users might get confused where > > which plugin is how developed and by whom. > > OTOH while thinking about, this is already partly the case as it will > > be always with independent plugins especially when a plugin author > > doesn't use the geany-plugins Sourceforge project and instead use some > > other place for hosting. > > So, my worries about that are maybe exaggerated. Perhaps it's enough > > when we try to keep update to date with the index page at > > http://plugins.geany.org and http://www.geany.org/Support/Plugins as a > > some kind of reference list of known plugins. > > > I'm all for this. So, which plugin developers (and the plugins they > develop) are in favour of this move exactly? Perhaps we could have some > sort of page on the website documenting this? I'm afraid I'm not 100% sure which point you are referring here to? Having a including-all-plugins-list-on-homepage or the general refactoring of svn and geany-pugins release? Cheers, Frank -- Frank Lanitz <fr...@frank.uvena.de> _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel