On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:36:26 +0200 Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Enrico Tröger schrieb: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 14:05:45 +0200, Frank wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:12:42 +0100 > >> Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Just wondering about some things for plugins in the geany-plugins > >>> release. (This doesn't apply for any plugins in SVN that aren't > >>> part of the release). > >>> > >>> Should there be a common minimum version for GTK/GLib? I think > >>> this might be a good idea. > >>> > >> I agree. Should be the same as Geany's in my opinion. > >> > > > > Yes, please. > > > > > I don't think the main Geany app should force plugin writers on any > GTK/GLib version. > It should be possible for the author/maintainer to use newer versions > if he thinks the new functions make it easier for him to maintain it, > or if they make the plugin better or something. > > But that all doesn't work since the plugins are combined to a single > package. They should built together, which basically implies a > minimum GTK/GLib version. I think it doesn't necessarily have to be > the minimum versions Geany uses. I'm afraid this might will cause some more confusion on user's side as he e.g. can compile Geany on its outdate Debian/Fedora/foo but cannot build the plugins. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpv7l42kdzo0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
