On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:31:12 +0200% Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 18:27, Nick Treleaven > <nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:58:11 +0100 > > Nick Treleaven <nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:31:03 +0300 > >> Dimitar Zhekov <dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, everyone, > >> > > >> > The status line is pretty crowded, as you know, so how about > >> > making it configurable? Something like: > >> > > >> > line: %l / %n\t col: %c\t sel: %s ... > >> > > >> > I can write it, if you think that's a good idea. > >> > >> I don't think it's worth it. > > > > OK, having thought more about it I think it could be configurable > > as a hidden pref. That way we can hide any less generally useful > > things like line count by default. > > Personally I find the total number of lines quite useful - it tells > you quickly how big the file is. Also the space "wasted" by its > presence is relatively small because it shares the caption with the > current line number. For me the least useful information is the > INS/OVR indication because this is already indicated by the cursor. > But in general I find the current state of the status bar OK. > > Jiri > I second that. From my opinion: - number of lines indication may be useful; - INS/OVR indication is probably excessive; - current state is ok, it's not so overcrowded. Best regards, Eugene. _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
