On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:30:00 +0200 Jiří Techet <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Attached you'll find a patch that updates the regex library to the > >> latest version from glibc. This removes the warnings Lex was > >> experiencing on a 64bit machine. I looked at how ctags does it and > >> made the patch in a similar way. > > > > I'm not sure if the glibc version will build on Windows. I don't have a > > Windows build environment set up ATM to try it. > > > > It might be best to use the version from latest CTags. The > > gnu_regex/README.txt says: > > "Minor changes were made to eliminate compiler errors and warnings." > > > > Using the same version as CTags could potentially also prevent any > > regex-incompatibility bugs with CTags parsers. > > As far as I remember the CTags version and the glibc version of regex > are basically the same. They're not the same, the diff is significant. I think we should use the CTags version. > I also changed some symbol name in the regex > sources because of a conflict with some symbol in my system header > files. What's the conflicting symbol? Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
