On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:14:20 +0100, Thomas wrote: >On 15.11.2010 22:58, Enrico Tröger wrote: >> >> I talked with Frank about this already in a private mail, also >> joining a patch to integrate it in the autotools build. Now he has >> two patches to choose :). > >IMO you (core) developers talk too much in private sometimes. The >development process, including discussions, should be open and >transparent.
I do agree. It was not to hide the discussion or anything. I was just making some changes to the plugins' build system or tested something or whatever and stumpled upon the error. So I made the little patch, sent it to Frank and added a note that even after compiling the plugin wouldn't work correctly because of the compiled-in Geany version. Honestly, I assumed Frank would just apply the patch, would have answered: yes, I'll fix it and voila. At this point I didn't know and expect the current lengthy discussion on the list. Mea culpa. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgp1S81FgFg7v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
