Le 03/05/2011 00:43, Jiří Techet a écrit : > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:33, Thomas Martitz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 02.05.2011 00:18, schrieb Jiří Techet: >>> >>> Yes, I would also prefer if there was a proper and complete git switch >>> (it would greatly save maintainer's work IMO) but I haven't seen much >>> enthusiasm from the core developers for the move so it's better if >>> people who use git have at least an up-to-date git mirror from which >>> they can create their private branches. >>> >> >> The core developers don't show very much enthusiasm since a while *in >> general*. Well, that's not entirely true I admit, Colomban is doing a great >> job and Nick has been more active recently too. But my general feeling, that >> the community around is more active these days, remains. > > But the question of whether to switch to git or not has to be decided > by the very core developers (Enrico, Nick). Without their decision all > our discussion is pointless because the switch just won't happen. > > So direct question: Enrico, Nick, what's your opinion on the git > switch? As Matthew said, it seems that it's possible to access a > github repository both via svn and git so both the current workflow > and git-based workflow should be possible. Of course I'll try to help > with whatever I can during the migration.
I second the Git switch, so 1/4 (and I guess Frank will second too). Just note I have no experience using GitHub (or even no real with Gitorious) or working with pull requests and co, but I'd be happy to git it a try -- and probably adopt it. Cheers, Colomban _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
