Le 12/09/2011 15:33, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Am 12.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling: >> Le 12/09/2011 11:16, Lex Trotman a écrit : >>>> Otherwise the whole fallback should be removed since it is confusing >>>> and may not run the browser the user expected (depending on the order >>>> in the list). At least when there is only the tools pref you know >>>> when its wrong, the browser won't go, with the fallback something >>>> unexpected may happen. >>>> >>> >>> In fact thinking about it some more Geany should tell the user that >>> browser command "xxx" did not work (xxx=tools pref command) and ask do >>> you want to try the following in order and print the list. We should >>> not fail to inform the user that the command did not work. >> >> Right. Now you say this, I think the better may perhaps to tell the >> user the browser failed to spawn, and ask her to provide the command to >> run in place (maybe with a few suggestions), and fill the pref with that >> new value (if working). What do you think? > > I like that approach.
What about the attached implementation? I'm not really fund of the dialog text I've used, if anybody has a better idea, please tell me ^^ Cheers, Colomban _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel