Am 22.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling: > Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> But why only 1.0? >>> >>> GNOME 3.* >>> KDE 4.* >>> Scite 2.* >>> >>> What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like >>> ''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ... >> >> Heh, I like "krumkach", sounds in German quite funny :). > > BTW, how are Geany codenames chosen? :-' > >> More seriously, I personally don't mind much about version numbers. >> It's good to have some but the actual value doesn't mean much to me. >> But I realise other people take more care about this and 0.x might seem >> not that mature to many users. >> >> So, I'd say: why not. > > I'd say quite the same. I don't really mind, and it seems it's > something important for many of you so...
But can we do it post 0.21? Only one week left and I want to concentrate on improving translation etc. instead of search&replace version numbers. Cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel