On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:19:30 +0200 Colomban Wendling <lists....@herbesfolles.org> wrote:
> Le 18/09/2011 04:55, Matthew Brush a écrit : > > Hi, > > Hey, > > > Does anyone have any opinions about me putting GeanyPy into > > geany-plugins SVN and trying to get it included in the next plugins > > release? > > It depends on whether GeanPy can be/is considered stable or not. If > it is, I see no reason why it couldn't be in geany-plugins; but if it > isn't I better wait until it becomes before releasing it as part of GP > (GP-released plugins are supposed to be production-ready). > > My POV *as somebody that never actually tried it* is that GeanyPy is > still a bit young and that it's likely to need some incompatible > changes for it to evolve. But again, I haven't developed it, and I > haven't even tried to write a plugin using it yet, I only seen > examples and discussions. In difference I gave it a try and I liked it, but I would disagree to put it into geany-plugins 0.21 as it will be feature/string freeze upcoming week and time to get it settled is a bit low IMHO. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp9Uo84y83H3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
