Le 30/11/2011 15:24, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > Am 30.11.2011 10:24, schrieb Lex Trotman: >> [...] >>> >>> I agree. Maybe we could add a section to HACKING file too as it would >>> fit there IMHO. >> >> Since we have a long release cycle lots of non-C speaking people use >> the Git version, so I think it needs to be where users can see it, not >> just us developers :) > > My understanding was that HACKING was the README for them. However, > maybe we should add a link between both. I don't think we need to refer > inside 'release' README to autogen.sh.
I don't think HACKING is the README for unreleased sources, it's the README for people wanting to modify Geany's sources... but yes, maybe it's supposed to be the same. However I agree, it makes no sense to tell people with a release tarball to run autogen.sh, since there is *no* autogen on release tarballs. So, maybe we could either add a note in the current HACKING, or add something like a README.git or whatever mentioning the difference with the tarballs? Cheers, Colomban _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel