On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:26:41 -0800 Matthew Brush <mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> On 11-12-04 06:09 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I didn't found the conclusion on the discussion: What was the > > outcome on this topic? Which reference to old svn shall be inserted > > into git repo? > > > > The conclusion is that the SVN-URL in the commit message is a valid > SVN URL to checkout that commit, so is fine. My complaint was that > it was a broken URL that didn't work, but I didn't realize it was not > a web-browser link, it's a link to work with SVN client. > > First I mentioned it in the original thread: > > **** FROM OTHER THREAD **** > On 11-11-04 04:03 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: > > Le 04/11/2011 23:28, Jiří Techet a écrit : > >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brush wrote: > >> OK, thanks. So is there any "official" conclusion which format > >> should be used? (I don't have any strong preference here.) > > > > I'd personally prefer to have a valid SVN URL rather than a valid > > HTTP link, but again, I don't mind much. > > > > Thanks for pointing out now *after* so much time and discussion that > the existing URL *was a valid SVN URL*. I'm glad I wasted my time :) > </sarcasm> > > @Jiri > I'd say it's your call, in light of this new information, I'd say > leave it as is and get it done as soon as you have time (assuming no > one else objects). > **** END FROM OTHER THREAD *** > > And then I clarified in your later thread since probably you didn't > read the first thread and mentioned it still being an open issue: > > **** FROM OTHER THREAD **** > On 11/15/2011 08:55 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > Hi developers, > > > > It has been a while when I first announced a mail about my idea of > > process after transition of geany-plugins repository. As from my > > understand the only open point is to have clarified the > > svn-url-reference question its a good point to tell you what I'm > > thinking of. > > > > The point is closed, see the thread, apologies for not making that > clear enough. IIUC it's basically just a matter of someone pushing > the repo unless people have committed to SVN in the meantime I guess > it needs to be re-processed.... > **** END FROM OTHER THREAD *** > > I guess this could be a third time that I can say it *THERE ARE NO > PENDING ISSUES, PLEASE PUSH THE PLUGINS TO GIT ALREADY!* :) Due to a lot of prosa I didn't found this. We will take original sf links. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgptkxXroc5ie.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
