On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:05:30 -0800 Matthew Brush <mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 05:13 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote: > > Am 10.01.2012 23:46, schrieb Matthew Brush: > >> On 01/07/2012 07:20 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote: > >>> Le 07/01/2012 16:00, Frank Lanitz a écrit : > >>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:42:39 +0100 > >>>> Frank Lanitz<fr...@frank.uvena.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> * What's the exact difference between Supported and > >>>>>> Maintained? The only difference I see is that "supported" has > >>>>>> the word "paid" in the description, but I doubt that most of > >>>>>> us get paid for this in particular, and I also doubt it > >>>>>> changes anything on how good is the support (hobby vs. job). > >>>>> > >>>>> My fault. I wanted to change this but missed it. I wanted to > >>>>> s/supported/paid for ... (Even I don't know anybody at the > >>>>> moment who is getting paid with Geany stuff ;) ) > >>>> > >>>> I suggest to use paid instead of supported and change current > >>>> usage of supported to maintained. > >>> > >>> I'm still not sure what that fact someone is paid or not changes, > >>> but otherwise it looks fine and clearer to me. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Whether paid or volunteer, it's still "Maintained". > >> > >> I suggest dropping the "Paid" status altogether if no one has used > >> it by the time all the plugins' info is filled in. > > > > I disagree. Currently there might be no plugin maintainer being > > paid to work on a plugin, but: > > - this might change (...) > > - is something user should be able to see to resynch there > > demandings with reality. > > > > Hehehe, well said. OK, it's not a big deal, though I still feel it's > not very useful for Geany-Plugins. Well, I will purge it for the meanwhile. We can add it once it comes back up again. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgp3xlRoFRnD0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
