On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:24:01 +1100 Lex Trotman <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Dimitar Zhekov <dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:39:52 +1100 > > > > I compile Geany with -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter (not the normal > > practice) and received a few warnings: > > Well, it should be normal practice, thats what HACKING says, I just > forgot to set it with a new clean clone, oops. Actually you should > add -O2 because a couple of the warnings need the dataflow computation > that the optimisation does. I only listed the warnings, -O2 is a sine qua non (albeit -Os -freorder-blocks is better for some systems). > The semantics of a command (well actually the label) that is "" vs > NULL is important, a "" label hides commands from a lower priority > source without showing itself in the menu, a NULL does not. [...] > > Unfortunately there isn't anthing else besides NULL that is sensible > to return to indicate out of range. So returning "" for COMMAND is possible... > So I've exposed build_get_group_count() as well so you can get the > count and then its your fault if you pass an out of range index :). ...but a count is fine too. :) Let's hope BuildFuncs makes it into the plugin interface, the current lack of build access is weird. -- E-gards: Jimmy _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel