On 12-05-07 08:32 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 8 May 2012 13:27, Matthew Brush<mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote:
On 12-05-07 05:03 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 8 May 2012 02:04, Nick Treleaven<nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 02/05/2012 05:46, Lex Trotman wrote:
4. Ctags parsers
Agree with Nick that the parsers are usable, but if we start modifying
them to handle local declarations then they will be totally
incompatible with the Ctags project so I guess it doesn't matter other
than for getting languages we don't currently parse.
ctags c.c already parses local tags
No it doesn't AFAICT:
I'm guessing he's referring to the "upstream" CTags c.c, which does have a
"l" kind for "local variables" (off by default). See `ctags --list-kinds=C`.
I'm not sure if the Geany fork has this, was forked before it was added, or
if the guy that wrote TM took it out.
Ok, I havn't looked at Ctags c.c because IIUC from other comments it
isn't really mergable with our c.c.
Does upstream c.c use tagmanager, and if so how does it structure
scopes? (A good exercise for your compiler :)
1) no
1a) I never could understand CTags scopes, something like a 2-byte
value, maybe an index into some array?
Cheers,
Matthew Brush
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
